USPTO serial 73644983
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WAUKESHA, WI
PUBLIC WATER CONDITIONING UTILITIES, INC.
WAUKESHA, WI
Other trademarks owned by PUBLIC WATER CONDITIONING UTILITIES, INC.
WAUKESHA, WI
WAUKESHA, WI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Anne Been, Samuel Fifer, Kevin W. Guynn, David R. Metzger, David W. Maher, Jordan A. Sigale, Edward H. Rice, Marina N. Saito, Alison P. Schwartz, Wenyu T. Blanchard, Mei Tsang, Brian R. McGinley, Dianne M. Smith-Misemer and Rebecca S. Stroder
VICTORIA NAPOLITANO CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL COMPANYONE CULLIGAN PKWYNORTHBROOK, IL 60062UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER PURIFICATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS, DEIONIZERS, FILTERS, WATER SOFTENERS, CHEMICAL FEED UNITS, DEGASIFIERS, ULTRAFILTRATION UNITS, MICROFILTRATION UNITS, ULTRAVIOLET STERILIZERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 30, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |