Drawing for ITTE INSTITUTE FOR THE TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY TO EDUCATION

USPTO serial 73645162

ITTE INSTITUTE FOR THE TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY TO EDUCATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1507073Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 4, 1988
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ITTE INSTITUTE FOR THE TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY TO EDUCATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AUGUST W. STEINHILBER

AUGUST W STEINHILBER1680 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016REPORTS AND NEWSLETTERS ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY TO EDUCATIONSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 16, 1985
041ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CONFERENCES AND LECTURES REGARDING THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATIONSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 16, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 11, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 16, 2005CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 11, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 30, 19958.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
May 11, 1995RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Mar 30, 1995PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Sep 23, 19948.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Sep 23, 1994XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Oct 4, 1988R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 12, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 24, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance