Drawing for FRESH EXPRESS

USPTO serial 73645281

FRESH EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN W. GRAY

BRIAN W GRAY BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDONINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP, 26TH FLBOX 25, COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1A9

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029READY-TO-EAT SANDWICHESABANDONEDJan 1, 1987
042OPERATION OF A SNACK BAR IN A CONVENIENCE STOREABANDONEDJan 1, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 7, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 28, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance