USPTO serial 73645333
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH, AUSTRALIA 2000, AU
SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH, AUSTRALIA 2000, AU
OVERSEAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (AUSTRALIA), THE
SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES 2000, AU
Other trademarks owned by OVERSEAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (AUSTRALIA), THE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY M. SQUYRES
MARY M SQUYRES WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFERGILSON AND LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COMPRISING TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS; NAMELY, MICROWAVE RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS AND PROTECTION SWITCHING UNITS THEREFOR, MICROWAVE RADIO REPEATERS, FIBER OPTIC TRANSMISSION UNITS, MULTIPLEX UNITS, CABLE CARRIER UNITS, SUBSCRIBER CARRIER SYSTEMS DATA TRANSMISSION UNITS, PULSE CODE MODULATION UNITS, SUPERVISORY CONTROL UNITS, ECHO SUPPRESSORS AND SIGNALING UNITS; CENTRAL OFFICE SYSTEMS; NAMELY, TELEPHONE SWITCHING UNITS, PRIVATE AUTOMATIC BRANCH EXCHANGEES, STATION EQUIPMENT; NAMELY, TELEPHONE SETS CORD CONNECTORS, COIN CONTROLLER TELEPHONE SETS, INTERCOMS, AND TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES; AND TELEPHONE AND TELEPHONE LINE TESTING INSTRUMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1993 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |