Drawing for OTC

USPTO serial 73645333

OTC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OTC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY M. SQUYRES

MARY M SQUYRES WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFERGILSON AND LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COMPRISING TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS; NAMELY, MICROWAVE RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS AND PROTECTION SWITCHING UNITS THEREFOR, MICROWAVE RADIO REPEATERS, FIBER OPTIC TRANSMISSION UNITS, MULTIPLEX UNITS, CABLE CARRIER UNITS, SUBSCRIBER CARRIER SYSTEMS DATA TRANSMISSION UNITS, PULSE CODE MODULATION UNITS, SUPERVISORY CONTROL UNITS, ECHO SUPPRESSORS AND SIGNALING UNITS; CENTRAL OFFICE SYSTEMS; NAMELY, TELEPHONE SWITCHING UNITS, PRIVATE AUTOMATIC BRANCH EXCHANGEES, STATION EQUIPMENT; NAMELY, TELEPHONE SETS CORD CONNECTORS, COIN CONTROLLER TELEPHONE SETS, INTERCOMS, AND TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES; AND TELEPHONE AND TELEPHONE LINE TESTING INSTRUMENTSABANDONED—
038PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 1993ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 19, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 26, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 21, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 28, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 23, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance