USPTO serial 73645728
COHERENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COHERENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS F. GOULD, JR.
LEWIS F GOULD JR STEELE, GOULD & FRIED3232 IVB BLDG1700 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT NAMELY- MODEMS, MULTIPLEXERS, ECHO CANCELLERS AND SIGNALLING MODULES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1987 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |