USPTO serial 73646768
SOLFINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLFINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRAZ. MADONNA ALTOMARE, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD D. STEINBERG
HAROLD D STEINBERG STEINBERG & RASKIN551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR SHAMPOOS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |