Drawing for RAYMA

USPTO serial 73647652

RAYMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1566966Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 1989
Examiner
BYERS, KRISTEN S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAYMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EUGENE J. KALIL

EUGENE J KALIL HOPGOOD, CALIMAFDE, KALIL, BLAUSTEIN& JUDLOWE60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010BIOMAGNETIC REGULATORS IN THE FORM OF BRACELETS TO BALANCE THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD OF THE WEARER TO RELIEVE HIGH AND LOW BLOOD PRESSURE, CIRCULATORY SYSTEM PROBLEMS, MUSCULAR RHEUMATISM, ARTHRITIC PAINSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 2, 1986
014BRACELETSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 2, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 1995C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 14, 1995CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 30, 1994PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 21, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 1988UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1988ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 24, 1988REINREINSTATED—
Jun 6, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1987CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance