USPTO serial 73648522
NDS NATIONAL DECISION SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NDS NATIONAL DECISION SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENCINITAS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L. HALLER
JOHN L HALLER BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MEADOR13TH FL110 W "C" STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL COMPUTER BASE COMPUTER SYSTEM COMPRISED OF; COMPUTERS, COMPUTER TERMINALS, DISK DRIVES, COMPUTER DISKS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1988 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |