Drawing for CLOTHES SHAVER

USPTO serial 73648957

CLOTHES SHAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1548341Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 1989
Examiner
—
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CLOTHES SHAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. William Beard, Jr., Bruce W. Slayden, Thomas R. Felger, Barton E. Showalter, Priscilla Dunckel, Paula D. Heyman

R. William Beard, Jr., Bruce W. Slayden, Thomas R. Baker Botts L.L.P.98 San Jacinto Blvd.1500 San Jacinto CenterAustin, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021BATTERY OPERATED LINT REMOVERSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 29, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 2, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 30, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 7, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 17, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 1995C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 11, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 18, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 1988ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 23, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1988CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 1, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 4, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance