Drawing for GLOBAL FINANCE

USPTO serial 73649034

GLOBAL FINANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACK, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOBAL FINANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NAN R. GEIST

NAN R GEIST BELL, KALNICK, BECKMAN, KLEE & GREEN300 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PERIODICAL NEWSLETTER AND MAGAZINE SERVING THE FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT PROFESSION AND PRIVATE INVESTORABANDONEDFeb 2, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1989PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 28, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance