USPTO serial 73649678
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
VENEUX LES SABLONS, FR
PARIS, FR
PARIS, FR
PARIS, FR
VENEUX LES SABLONS, FR
VENEUX LES SABLONS, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Concannon
Patrick J. Concannon Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP155 Seaport BoulevardSeaport WestBoston, MA 02210| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | [ EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING AND BUSINESS EDUCATION SEMINARS, AND CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED THERETO ] * EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN THE FORM OF SEMINARS AND TRAINING COURSES IN THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INTENDED TO TRAIN AND DEVELOP BUSINESS AND INSTITUTIONAL EXECUTIVES IN ALL RESPECTS OF MARKETING AND OTHER BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING FUNCTIONS, UTILIZING ACTUAL CLIENT SITUATIONS TO FACILITATE AND MAXIMIZE THE EFFECT OF SUCH TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND UTILIZING SOFTWARE PROGRAMS TO OFFER DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS, AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATIONAL TRAINING CONCERNING BUSINESS MANAGEMENT * | ACTIVE | Apr 19, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 24, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2001 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1991 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |