USPTO serial 73650157
PERMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
SAINT DENIS, FR
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
RUEIL MALMAISON, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD D. JEFFERY
DONALD D JEFFERY FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST N WP O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS FOR THE SOFTENING AND PURIFYING OF WATER AND THE PROTECTION OF INSTALLATIONS INCLUDING SUCH WATER, FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | APPARATUS AND COMPONENTS THEREFOR FOR SOFTENING, PURIFYING, FILTERING AND DEMINERALIZING WATER, FOR DOMESTIC, SANITARY, MEDICAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PERMO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BWT FRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by PERMO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PERMO S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BWT FRANCE S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PERMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |