USPTO serial 73650813
ROOM MATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABATE CANDICE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROOM MATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEONARD HOLTZ
LEONARD HOLTZ FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & WOODWARD261 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HOUSEWARES, NAMELY SALAD SERVERS, CAKE SERVERS, CHEESE SLICER/KNIFE, TOILET PLUNGER, LADLES, SPATULAS, SPOONS, FORKS | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1986 |
| 021 | HOUSEWARES, NAMELY BRUSH HOLDERS, SCRUB BRUSHES, BLIND BRUSHES, BOTTLE BRUSHES, NAIL/VEGETABLE BRUSHES, DUST PAN BRUSHES, BODY BRUSHES, TOILET BRUSHES, LINT BRUSHES, FEATHER DUSTERS, PIANO DUSTERS, TABLE CRUMB REMOVER, TABLE DUST PAN/CRUMB REMOVER, DUST PANS, CORKSCREWS, DRESSER TRAY AND VALET TRAY, SHOE HORN, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDER, GLASS HOLDERS, SOAP DISH, TISSUE BOX, TOILET PAPER HOLDERS | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1989 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 1989 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |