USPTO serial 73653600
TRI-PASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRI-PASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AALEN-WASSERALFINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, ET ALSTE 912 1725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ROLLERS OF METAL FOR CALENDARS AND MACHINES FOR THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF CONTINUOUS WEB MATERIAL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |