USPTO serial 73655124
PATISFRANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1559150Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PATISFRANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. LEEDS
HENRY W LEEDS BRYLAWSKI, CLEARY & LEEDS801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE S EWASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS, PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; APPLESAUCE; MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, CHEESE AND VEGETABLE-BASED ENTREES; JELLIES, JAMS, MARMALADE; EGGS, MILK, BUTTER, CHEESES, CREAMS AND OTHER DAIRY PRODUCTS (EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT); EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; MARGARINE; SALAD DRESSINGS; PRESERVES; PROCESSED NUTS; PROCESSED NUT CREAMS; CREAM, FRUIT AND NUT PASTE FILLINGS FOR PASTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE, FLOUR AND CANDY; BREAD, BISCUITS, CAKES, PASTRY; HONEY, TREACLE, YEAST, BAKING POWDER, SALT, MUSTARD, VINEGAR, SAUCES (EXCLUDING SALAD DRESSINGS, APPLESAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE); SPICES, SEASONINGS, FOOD FLAVORINGS, COOKING CHOCOLATE, PASTRY GLAZES, FOOD STABILIZERS, TABLE SYRUPS AND TOPPING SYRUPS, FROSTINGS, MOUSSE, CUSTARD AND CHOCOLATE FILLINGS FOR PASTRY, MIXES FOR MAKING BAKERY FOODS, CONFECTIONERY SUGAR, SUGAR SYRUPS AND CORN SYRUPS, AND CONFECTIONERY CREAM MIXES, AND ORANGE BLOSSOM WATER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PATISFRANCE, SOCIETE ANONYME
- Other trademarks owned by PATISFRANCE, SOCIETE ANONYME
- Other trademarks owned by PATISFRANCE, SOCIETE ANONYME
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named PATISFRANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |