Drawing for E DAYCO COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE

USPTO serial 73655933

E DAYCO COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1508598Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 11, 1988
Examiner
MARKS, MARTIN H.
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with E DAYCO COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson BRIDGE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES PLLC23716 Woodward AvenuePleasant Ridge, MI 48069-1130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY TRAINING OTHERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF HYDRAULIC AND INDUSTRIAL HOSE AND POWER TRANSMISSION PRODUCTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 31, 1986
042QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH MANUFACTURED PRODUCTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 1, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 7, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 15, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 11, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 24, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 21, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 21, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 20, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 25, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 2, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 26, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 29, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 19, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 25, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 12, 2008RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 12, 200889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 12, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2008E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 22, 1994C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 12, 1994RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Jul 28, 1994PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 27, 1993815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 11, 1988R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance