USPTO serial 73656248
5-281X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROGERS, GERARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 5-281X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. LEONARDI
ROBERT M LEONARDI DANA CORPORATIONP O BOX 1000TOLEDO, OH 43697UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | COUPLINGS, SPECIFICALLY UNIVERSAL JOINT COUPLINGS FOR USE IN DRIVELINES FOR VEHICLES | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 13, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 22, 1988 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |