Drawing for FRESH GOURMET

USPTO serial 73656863

FRESH GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1530348Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 1989
Examiner
PRICE, JERRY
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT R. MILLER

RIORDAN & MCKINZIE300 S GRAND AVE29TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ FOOD STUFFS, NAMELY SALAD DRESSINGS, DIP MIXES, AVOCADO OIL, PROCESSED FRUIT AND VEGETABLES ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 26, 1987
030CROUTONS, SAUCE MIXES, SEASONING MIXES AND SAUCES EXCLUDING APPLE AND CRANBERRY SAUCESEXPIREDFeb 26, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 15, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 31, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 19968.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED—
Oct 25, 1996COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 6, 1996AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Nov 6, 1995PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Mar 13, 19958.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Mar 14, 1989R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Dec 27, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance