USPTO serial 73657146
S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J. MCGLEW
JOHN J MCGLEW SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/REPRODUCERS, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/REPRODUCERS WITH DUPULICATING, DUBBING AND EDITING APPARAUS, VIDEO CAMERAS WITH VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/REPRODUCERS, TELEVISION RECEIVERS WITH VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/REPRODUCERS, VIDEO TAPES, PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES AND PARTS FOR THE FOREGOING GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |