USPTO serial 73657199
CRAFTED CRYSTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 1992
- Examiner
- GRENDEL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRAFTED CRYSTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREDERICK B. ZIESENHEIM
FREDERICK B ZIESENHEIM WEBB, BURDEN, ZIESENHEIM & WEBB, PC515 OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2363UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | HAND BLOWN GLASSWARE; NAMELY, STEMWARE, TUMBLERS, PITCHERS, DECANTERS AND VASES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 2, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1991 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |