Drawing for SPECIALITY ADHESIVES

USPTO serial 73657699

SPECIALITY ADHESIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPECIALITY ADHESIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY J. LUNN

GREGORY J LUNN WOOD, HERRON & EVANS2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017PACKETS OF CHEMICALS WHICH ARE PLACED IN THE PACKAGING OR CONTAINERS OF FOODSTUFFS, ESPECIALLY MEAT PRODUCTS, TO ABSORB MOISTURE AND BACTERIA AND THEREFORE PRESERVE THE FOODSTUFFS FOR A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME.ABANDONEDMar 1, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 8, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 27, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance