USPTO serial 73658618
Serial No. 73658618
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDONALD, MARY KAY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 73658618?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD S. WEINTRAUB
ARNOLD S WEINTRAUB BASILE, WEINTRAUB & HANLONSTE 555900 TWR DRTROY, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE SERVICES FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, NEWSPAPERS AND RESTAURANTS | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1987 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTING SERVICES, BUSINESS INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES, AND CAPITAL INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |