USPTO serial 73658679
DIGITAL CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEWALL P. BRONSTEIN
SEWALL P BRONSTEIN DIKE, BRONSTEIN, ROBERTS, CUSHMAN130 WATER STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY THE CONDUCTING OF SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING, DATA COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |