USPTO serial 73658682
DIPARMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 1991
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIPARMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
GLENVIEW, IL
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
GLENVIEW, IL
BIRMINGHAM, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD B. AIKEN
DONALD B AIKEN DI GIORNO FOODS COC/O KRAFT, INCKRAFT COURTGLENVIEW, IL 60025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FRESH PASTA AND PASTA SAUCES EXCLUDING CRANBERRY SAUCE AND APPLESAUCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CATELLI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DI GIORNO FOODS CO.
- Other trademarks owned by 16759 CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DI GIORNO FOODS CO.
- Other trademarks owned by PASQUALE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DIPARMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 1991 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 1991 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 7, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |