Drawing for Serial No. 73659099

USPTO serial 73659099

Serial No. 73659099

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73659099?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY K. SINGH

AMY K SINGH SIDLEY AND AUSTINSTE 4700ONE FIRST NATIONAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MANAGING RETIREMENT HOMESABANDONED—
036PROVIDING LOANS FOR HOTELS AND OTHER REAL PROPERTYABANDONED—
037CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION, PLANNING AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIESABANDONED—
042CONSTRUCTION DRAFTING SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 21, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 30, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 25, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 16, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 28, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance