USPTO serial 73659101
SPEYHAWK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPEYHAWK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY K. SINGH
AMY K SINGH SIDLEY & AUSTINSTE 4700ONE FIRST NATIONAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MORTGAGES AND OTHER LOANS FOR REAL ESTATE AND HOTELS | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING, LAYING OUT AND CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIES AND BUILDINGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | RETIREMENT HOME SERVICES; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |