USPTO serial 73659453
WATERMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATERMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. BECHLER
LAWRENCE E BECHLER JENSWOLD, STUDT, HANSON, ET ALSTE 90016 N CARROLL STMADISON, WI 53703Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER SOFTENING AND CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, AUTOMATIC WATER SOFTENERS AND CONDITIONERS FOR DOMESTIC AND LIGHT COMMERCIAL USE | ABANDONED | Nov 3, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |