Drawing for QUICK CALL U.S.A.

USPTO serial 73659639

QUICK CALL U.S.A.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK CALL U.S.A.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENNETH R. GLASER

KENNETH R GLASER GLASER, GRIGGS & SCHWARTZSTE 1540THREE LINCOLN CTR 5430 LBJ FWYDALLAS, TX 75240

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038OPERATOR ASSISTED LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES FOR INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CALLSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 21, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance