USPTO serial 73659692
TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 1989
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PARSIPPANY, NJ
SUNNYVALE, CA
FREEPORT, IL
PARSIPPANY, NJ
PARSIPPANY, NJ
SUNNYVALE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA WINGER; CHRISTOPHER B. SCHNEIDER
LISA WINGER CHRISTOPHER B SCHNEIDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RD STE 100OAK BROOK, IL 60523UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | CUSTOM ROLL-UP WINDOW SHADES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEVOLOR LORENTZEN INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEVOLOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LEVOLOR LORENTZEN INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEVOLOR LORENTZEN INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DW WINDOW COVERINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 16, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 16, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |