Drawing for DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE

USPTO serial 73659795

DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. WILLIAM HAYTON

J WILLIAM HAYTON BELL, BOYD & LLCSTE 3200 THREE FIRST NATIONAL PLZ70 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING DRIVER TRAINING COURSES AND TRAINING INSTRUCTORS TO TEACH SUCH COURSESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 1989EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 13, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 23, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 13, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance