USPTO serial 73660220
MURDOCH TRAVEL SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1514190Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 1988
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MURDOCH TRAVEL SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. FIDDLER
ROBERT W FIDDLER FIDDLER & LEVINE7814 EMPIRE STATE BLDGNEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A COMPUTER DATA BASE IN THE FIELD OF HOTEL AND TRAVEL RESERVATIONS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1992 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 31, 1991 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 6, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 16, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |