Drawing for SPRING BREAK REUNION GREATER FT. LAUDERDALE

USPTO serial 73660276

SPRING BREAK REUNION GREATER FT. LAUDERDALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OMELKO, NANCY LOU
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRING BREAK REUNION GREATER FT. LAUDERDALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROGER M. BERNSTEIN

ROGER M BERNSTEINSTE 20169 MERRICK WAYCORAL GABLES, FL 33134

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ADVERTISING AND BUSINESSABANDONEDAug 29, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 1988ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 1988PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 1, 1988PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance