USPTO serial 73660325
IADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GLOUCESTERSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL L. MAU
MICHAEL L MAU MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET ALSTE ONE THOUSANDNORWEST CTRSAINT PAUL, MN 55101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PUNCHED (ENCODED) CARDS, PUNCHED (ENCODED) TAPES; MAGNETIC TAPES, MAGNETIC DISCSAND MAGNETIC CORES, ALL FOR USE WITH COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAMS; MEMORIES FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS AND WITH MICRO-PROCESSORS | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, PRINTED MANUALS, PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS, ALL RELATING TO COMPUTER PROGRAMS; CARDS AND PAPER TAPES, ALL FOR THE RECORDAL OFCOMPUTER PROGRAMS; MANUALS, SPECIFICATIONS, ALL BEING PRINTED AND ALL RELATING TO DATA COLLECTION, PROCESSING AND CONTROL | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |