USPTO serial 73660458
MARINESOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARINESOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SERGE ANISSIMOFF
SERGE ANISSIMOFF BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDONP O BOX 25TORONTO, ON M5L 1A9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY SOLICITATION OF PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISING FROM THE BOATING, POWERCRAFT AND YACHTING, INCLUDING POWERPLANTS THEREFOR, AFTERMARKET MANUFACTURERS AND PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CATALOGUES, MANUALS AND PUBLICATIONS CONTAINING SAID ADVERTISING TO THE TRADE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |