USPTO serial 73660598
SUNDSTRAND SAUER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNDSTRAND SAUER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C. WOOD
JAMES C WOOD WOOD, DALTON, PHILLIPS, MASON & ROWESTE 3800 NORTHWESTERN ATRUIM CTR200 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES, NAMELY, HYDRAULIC PUMPS, HYDRAULIC MOTORS, HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSIONS COMPRISING A HYDRAULIC PUMP AND A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, GEARBOXES FOR USE WITH HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSIONS, AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | Mar 17, 1987 |
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLS COMPRISING ELECTROHYDRAULIC TRANSDUCERS AND ELECTRICAL SENSORS AND PARTS THEREOF, ALL OF THE FOREGOING BEING FOR CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSIONS, HYDRAULIC POWER SYSTEMS FOR STATIONARY USE, AND OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES AND THEIR WORKING IMPLEMENTS | ABANDONED | Apr 13, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |