USPTO serial 73661825
SAFE-T-GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 1988
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SAFE-T-GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, VA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
NATIONAL RUBBER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
Maria v. Hardison Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street N.Arlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | ROOF WALKING MATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NRI MANUFACTURING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER COMPANY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL RUBBER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named SAFE-T-GUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 16, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 16, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Dec 10, 1991 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |