USPTO serial 73662751
EXTASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXTASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIUS J. JASON
MARIUS J JASON FELFE & LYNCH805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | EAU DE TOILETTE, PERFUME, PERFUME OIL, PERFUME ROLL-ON, TOILET SOAP, SHOWER GEL, BODY LOTION, FOAM BATH, DEODORANT CREAM, DEODORANT STICK, DEODORANT SPRAY AND AFTER SHAVE LOTION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |