Drawing for MULTI-SCAN

USPTO serial 73662938

MULTI-SCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1513216Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 15, 1988
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTI-SCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PETER E. HEUSER

PETER E HEUSER KOLISCH, HARTWELL & DICKINSON200 PACIFIC BLDG520 S W YAMHILL STPORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER MONITORS AND KEYBOARDSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMay 15, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 1990CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 30, 1990C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 2, 1990CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 1989PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 15, 1988R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 15, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance