USPTO serial 73662942
AUDREY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUDREY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT B. BARLOW, JR.
HERBERT B BARLOW JR BARLOW & BARLOW, LTD1150 NEW LONDON AVECRANSTON, RI 02920UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ABANDONED | Nov 22, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1989 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 1988 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |