USPTO serial 73663160
SRW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SRW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WOOLCOMBERS (PROCESSORS) LIMITED
BRADFORD, WEST YORKSHIRE, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | YARNS, THREADS AND KNITTING WOOLS | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | TEXTILE FABRICS, NAMELY, BED LINENS, BED COVERS, CURTAINS, KNITTED FABRICS FOR CLOTHING, UPHOLSTERY FABRIC, TOWELS, TABLECLOTHS, SERVIETTES | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | ARTICLES OF CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, TROUSERS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, JACKETS, GLOVES, OVERCOATS, JERSEYS, PULLOVERS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, SUITS, SOCKS, HOSIERY, SCARVES, HEAD SCARVES, SHAWLS, DRESSING GOWNS, BATHOBES, BATHING TRUNKS, SWIMSUITS, UNDERWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |