USPTO serial 73663227
DANGDUJOONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DANGDUJOONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY C. SPOONER
STANLEY C SPOONER STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHERP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | TEA, COFFEE SUBSTITUTES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |