USPTO serial 73663708
CARDINAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 1990
- Examiner
- HOLTZMAN, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARDINAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARC W. WITZIG
MARC W WITZIG DUANE, MORRIS & HECKSCHER10TH FL THE PAYNE-SHOEMAKER BLDG240 N THIRD STHARRISBURG, PA 17101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY DISPLAY MONITORS, KEYBOARDS, PRINTERS AND FULL TERMINALS ALL FOR USE IN THE ON-LINE COMPUTER SERVICES FIELD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARDINAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARDINAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARDINAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CARDINAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |