Drawing for BIRD BARRIER

USPTO serial 73664057

BIRD BARRIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRD BARRIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT W. DICKERSON

ROBERT W DICKERSON LYON & LYON34TH FL611 W SIXTH STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006DEVICE FOR DETERRING BIRDS FROM PERCHING COMPRISING A COILED WIRE ATTACHABLE TO THE PERCH LOCATIONABANDONEDApr 9, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 24, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 24, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 24, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 24, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 30, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 2, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance