USPTO serial 73664386
METAAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METAAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES N. VIDEBECK
JAMES N VIDEBECK TER EXECUTIVE CTRCOURT C 1 S376 SUMMIT AVEOAK BROOK TERRACE, IL 60181Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | ALUMINUM COOKWARE AND SERVEWARE, NAMELY, COOKING AND SERVING TRAYS, OVEN PLATTERS, HANDLED OVEN SERVERS, BAKING DISHES AND DECORATIVE SERVING PIECES | ABANDONED | May 13, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1989 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 8, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 1989 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |