USPTO serial 73664476
SPIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 1992
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDINBURGH EH6 5NG, GB
EDINBURGH EH6 5NG, GB
EDINBURGH EH6 5NG, GB
LEITH EDINBURGH EH 67EL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Brennan, Lisa M. DuRoss
Michael P. Brennan, Lisa M. DuRoss Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.P.O. Box 828Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS INCORPORATING PRE-PROGRAMMED MEMORIES FOR OPERATING LOCAL AREA NETWORKS AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS (SUCH COMPUTER PERIPHERALS BEING IN THE FORM OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PROGRAMMES, PRE-RECORDED CD-ROMS, MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, RECORDING DISCS AND RECORDING TAPES.) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPIDER SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SPIDER SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SPIDER SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SPIDER SOFTWARE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SPIDER
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |