USPTO serial 73665155
IKON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IKON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN F. OSTRAGER
GLENN F OSTRAGER BARST & MUKAMAL19TH FL2 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CAMERAS WITH A SINGLE NONREMOVABLE FIXED FOCAL LENGTH LENS, NOT INCLUDING CAMERAS WITH CONTINUOUS MANUAL FOCUSSING OR MANUALLY SET SHUTTER SPEEDS OR APERTURES | ABANDONED | May 19, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |