USPTO serial 73665157
DUCKS UNLIMITED GREENWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOGAN, JEAN E.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUCKS UNLIMITED GREENWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH S. CLIFTON
DEBORAH S CLIFTON PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR28TH FL41 S HIGH STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY HATS | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |