USPTO serial 73665942
EXCLUSIVE PROVIDER NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 1989
- Examiner
- MCDONALD, MARY KAY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXCLUSIVE PROVIDER NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice W. Housey
Janice W. Housey Latimer, Mayberry & Matthews IP Law, LLP13873 Park Center Road Suite 106Herndon, VA 20171UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ADMINISTRATION OF A HEALTH CARE SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES MEDICAL CARE AT PREFERRED RATES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COST CARE, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by COST CARE, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by WELLPOINT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named EXCLUSIVE PROVIDER NETWORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 18, 1994 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 31, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 3, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |