USPTO serial 73666203
FLOWER FAIRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1649215Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 1991
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOWER FAIRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONDON, GB
LONDON W1N 8NQ, GB
LONDON W1N 8NQ, GB
LONDON W1N 8NQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PASQUALE A RAZZANO
Pasquale A. Razzano Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ MASCARA, LIPSTICK, FACEPOWDER, NAIL VARNISH, PERSONAL DEODORANTS, PERFUME, SHAMPOO, BATHOIL, ] TOILET SOAP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FREDERICK WARNE & CO LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GRESHAM MARKETING LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GRESHAM MARKETING LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GRESHAM MARKETING LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named FLOWER FAIRIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 7, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 9, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |