USPTO serial 73667070
ROAD KING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROAD KING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BILL C. PANAGOS
BILL C PANAGOS PATENT DEPTBASF CORPORATION1419 BIDDLE AVEWYANDOTTE, MI 48192-3736Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ANTIFREEZE/COOLANT FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE MOTOR VEHICLE COOLING SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | May 21, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 1990 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 12, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |